Why is a supplier liable under strict liability even if they did not inspect a product?

A supplier is liable under strict liability because the law imposes responsibility for defective products regardless of whether the supplier acted with negligence or conducted an inspection of the product. This legal doctrine is based on the principle that suppliers, including manufacturers and retailers, are in the best position to ensure the safety and quality of their products. When a product is found to be defective and causes harm, the duty to compensate affected parties falls on the supplier, as they have a direct relationship with the consumer and can bear the financial responsibility for any injuries caused.

This approach encourages higher safety standards in product distribution since liability exists independently of the supplier's actions or lack thereof. It also helps protect consumers, as they can seek redress without having to prove negligence, which can be a challenging and complex undertaking. The focus is primarily on the defectiveness of the product and its impact on consumers, rather than the supplier's intentions or precautions taken.

In contrast to this, other choices may imply conditions or requirements that do not align with strict liability principles, such as the need for negligence to be established or the provision of warranties, which do not apply in strict liability cases.