Which statement is true regarding an anticipated trespasser?

The correct statement regarding an anticipated trespasser is that they must be warned of known dangerous conditions. Anticipated trespassers are individuals who, although they may be committing an unlawful act by being on the property, the property owner has reason to expect that they will enter the property. Due to this expectation, the landowner has a duty to exercise reasonable care for their safety.

This includes the obligation to inform anticipated trespassers of known hazards that could pose a danger to them. For instance, if there is a hazardous condition like a deep hole or a exposed electrical wire, the property owner must take necessary steps to warn these individuals of the danger, as it is likely they may not be aware of it and might be drawn into the property, potentially leading to injury.

Other options do not accurately reflect the legal obligations regarding anticipated trespassers. While they are not owed the same high duty of care as invitees—who are individuals invited onto the property—they still receive some protections under the law. The idea that no warning is necessary if a trespasser climbs over a fence overlooks the concept of foreseeability, which plays a crucial role in determining the property owner's responsibilities. Hence, it is essential to understand how these duties are delineated