Which of the following is not considered an interlocutory order that may be appealed?

In the context of appellate law, interlocutory orders are those that are issued during the course of a case, which are not final judgments and typically cannot be appealed until the entire case is resolved. A final judgment, on the other hand, is a ruling that concludes the case and resolves all issues between the parties.

The correct response identifies a final judgment on a motion to dismiss, which is distinct from interlocutory orders. When a case is dismissed, it marks the conclusion of the proceedings for that particular action, allowing the party affected by the dismissal to appeal. This is in contrast to the other choices, which represent various types of interlocutory orders. The order granting an injunction, appointing a receiver, and changing possession of property are all decisions made during litigation that do not resolve the case entirely, thereby classifying them as interlocutory.

This distinction is crucial in understanding appellate procedures, as parties must know which decisions can be appealed immediately and which must await the final resolution of the case.