Which of the following is NOT a requirement for establishing a claim of trespass to land?

To establish a claim of trespass to land, certain elements must be satisfied. These include the causation of the intrusion, intent to intrude, and the act of unlawfully entering land that is in the possession of another without permission.

The requirement regarding causation of the intrusion is essential because it connects the defendant's actions to the unlawful entry on the land. Additionally, intent is a fundamental element in trespass claims, as the trespasser must have either intended to enter the land or acted with reckless disregard of the consequences of their actions. The intrusion must occur on land that the plaintiff possesses, emphasizing the protection of property rights.

Physical injury to the person is not a requirement for a trespass claim. Even if the trespasser does not cause any physical harm to an individual, the mere act of trespassing can still result in liability for the landowner. Trespass to land focuses primarily on the unauthorized use of another's property, regardless of any physical consequences to the person. Thus, this option—physical injury to the person—does not align with the fundamental elements necessary to establish a trespass to land claim and is therefore the correct choice as the requirement that is NOT necessary.