Which of the following is an example of an interlocutory appeal?

An interlocutory appeal pertains to an appeal of a ruling made before the final judgment in a case. It allows a party to seek review of some decision made by the trial court that isn't a final judgment but may have significant implications for the case's progress.

In the context of the given choices, an order to dissolve an injunction clearly represents an interlocutory appeal. This is because such an order typically occurs before the conclusion of the entire case and has immediate effects on the parties, potentially altering their rights or obligations significantly. The ability to appeal such an order before a final judgment can help avoid further harm or the possibility of a judgment that could be rendered moot by changes in circumstances related to the injunction.

The other options do not fit the definition of an interlocutory appeal. A final judgment on the merits concludes the litigation and represents a definitive resolution of the parties' claims; therefore, it is not interlocutory. An application for a continuance is a request to postpone proceedings and does not constitute a decision subject to appeal. Similarly, a motion for a protective order, although it can be appealed under certain circumstances, primarily deals with discovery issues and does not carry the same immediate and significant ramifications as an order to dissolve an injunction. Thus