Which of the following aspects is NOT part of the Lemon Test?

The Lemon Test, established in the Supreme Court case Lemon v. Kurtzman, is a three-pronged test used to determine whether a law or government action violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. The correct answer pertains to the aspect that does not fit into the framework of the Lemon Test.

The Lemon Test consists of the following prongs: first, the government action must have a secular legislative purpose; second, the primary effect of the action must neither advance nor inhibit religion; and third, the action must not foster an excessive entanglement with religion.

In this regard, "advancement of religion" is related but does not capture the full scope of what the Lemon Test assesses. The second prong specifies that the action cannot have the primary effect of advancing or inhibiting religion, rather than simply focusing on the advancement of religion alone. Therefore, identifying "advancement of religion" as not being part of the Lemon Test is accurate since it neglects the balance found in the second prong, which simultaneously addresses both advancement and inhibition of religion.

Understanding this context is critical for applying constitutional principles related to the separation of church and state, especially in evaluation scenarios involving government actions and religious institutions.