Which grounds are not valid for relief from a final judgment?

The grounds for relief from a final judgment are typically well-defined under both statutory and case law. Unpopular decisions of a judgment do not constitute a valid reason for seeking relief. The legal system recognizes that a judgment may not always align with popular opinion or the sentiments of a losing party, but this alone does not justify overturning or nullifying a final judgment. Courts aim for the finality of judgments to promote stability and legal certainty, and allowing appeals or relief based solely on the unpopularity of a decision would undermine this principle.

In contrast, the other options provide legitimate bases for seeking relief. Fraud or misrepresentation involves deception that could have impacted the outcome of the case; this is a recognized ground for relief because it threatens the integrity of the judicial process. Newly discovered evidence can warrant relief if it is material and could not have been discovered through reasonable diligence before the original trial, affecting the fairness of the judgment. Similarly, excusable neglect relates to a failure to act that was beyond the control of the party and can provide a basis for relief, as it considers circumstances that warrant leniency in terms of procedural compliance.