What was the decision of the Supreme Court in Payton v. New York regarding warrantless entry?

Study for the California Bar Exam. Engage with flashcards and multiple choice questions, each question offers hints and explanations. Prepare effectively for your exam!

In Payton v. New York, the Supreme Court held that warrantless entry into a suspect's home for the purpose of making a routine arrest is unconstitutional, except in exigent circumstances, commonly referred to as emergencies. This ruling emphasizes the importance of the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures. The Court determined that the home is a protected space where individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy. As such, police officers need a warrant to enter a home unless they can demonstrate an immediate necessity that justifies circumventing that legal requirement, such as the risk of evidence being destroyed or a threat to officers or public safety. Therefore, the decision was primarily centered around the concept that warrantless entry is generally not permissible without an emergency situation that necessitates immediate action.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy