What is required for a witness to verify photographs as admissible evidence?

In order for photographs to be admitted as evidence in court, a witness must confirm the accuracy of the portrayal of the facts depicted in those photographs. This means that the witness should have sufficient knowledge about the subject matter of the photographs and be able to attest that the images accurately represent what they purport to show. This requirement ensures that the photographs serve as reliable evidence, contributing to the establishment of the facts of the case.

The other options do not provide sufficient grounds for admitting photographs into evidence. A witness need not be the person who took the photographs, nor is it necessary for them to establish the specific time when the photographs were taken, as long as context supports their relevance. Additionally, while expert testimony can enhance understanding in some cases, it is not a prerequisite for laying the foundational basis for photographic evidence. As long as a witness can affirm that the images are an accurate depiction relevant to the case, the photographs may be introduced as evidence.