What is indicated about the burden of simplicity for interrogatories?

The assertion that the burden is considered the same for both parties accurately reflects the principle governing interrogatories within the context of discovery in civil litigation. In California, both parties have obligations regarding discovery, including the duty to provide information in response to interrogatories. The responding party is responsible for answering the interrogatories fully and truthfully, while the requesting party bears the responsibility to formulate clear and relevant questions.

In this collaborative discovery process, it's essential for both parties to work within their respective burdens. The requesting party must craft interrogatories that are sufficiently clear and relevant to the issues at hand. If the interrogatories are overly broad or not well-constructed, the responding party may have grounds to object or seek relief. This mutual responsibility emphasizes that both sides share a role in facilitating the discovery process, rather than placing the burden on just one party.

The other options suggest varying interpretations of the burden that do not align with the fundamental principles of discovery. Therefore, understanding that the burden is a shared responsibility helps clarify the dynamics involved in interrogatories during litigation.