What constitutes a prima facie case in products liability based on strict tort liability?

Study for the California Bar Exam. Engage with flashcards and multiple choice questions, each question offers hints and explanations. Prepare effectively for your exam!

In a products liability case based on strict tort liability, establishing a prima facie case requires the plaintiff to demonstrate specific elements, one of which is that the product was defective at the time it left the defendant's control. This means that the defect in the product contributed to the injury sustained by the plaintiff, and the plaintiff does not need to prove negligence on part of the manufacturer or seller.

For strict liability, the focus is on the condition of the product itself rather than the actions of the defendant. If the product is found to be unreasonably dangerous or defective—even if the manufacturer followed all safety standards—strict liability may still apply. This standard emphasizes consumer safety and protecting purchasers from harm due to defective products, holding manufacturers and sellers accountable for ensuring their products are safe for use.

The other options do not accurately reflect the necessary elements for a prima facie case in strict tort liability. Having a witness to a product failure is not a requirement; a product can be demonstrated to be defective through evidence other than eyewitness testimony. Similarly, whether a supplier is commercial or non-commercial does not relate to the strict liability standards. Lastly, it is not necessary for the defendant to show that the product was used correctly; the focus is instead on the product

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy