According to the Statute of Frauds, when must a contract modification be in writing?

Study for the California Bar Exam. Engage with flashcards and multiple choice questions, each question offers hints and explanations. Prepare effectively for your exam!

The requirement for a contract modification to be in writing under the Statute of Frauds stems primarily from the nature of certain contracts, especially those that involve the sale of goods. According to the Statute of Frauds, specifically in the context of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), any contract for the sale of goods priced at $500 or more must be in writing to be enforceable.

Thus, when contract modifications occur that result in the modified contract price exceeding this $500 threshold, the modification itself must be documented in writing to comply with the Statute of Frauds. This ensures that all parties have a clear understanding of the terms and reduces the likelihood of disputes over the specifics of the agreement.

In scenarios where the other options suggest conditions like exceeding original contract terms or verbal agreement—while these may have implications for enforceability or validity—none of these explicitly address the critical dollar amount parameter established by the Statute of Frauds for modifications pertaining to contracts for the sale of goods. The importance of having a written modification increases significantly as the dollar amount involved exceeds this legally recognized limit. Thus, the insistence on a written modification, in this case, aligns directly with the provisions of the Statute of Frauds and is vital for ensuring

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy